Web Hosting Reviews Driven by Data, Not Dollars

I'm disgusted with fake webhosting "reviews." Since 2014, I've been tracking the results of real-life performance tests for downtime, speed & support at the world's most popular web hosting companies. You'll be shocked by the results...

Fastest Web Hosting: Page Speed Test Results

This test measures the total time it takes to load a standard web page. Lower is better.

This test is performed by submitting a typical web page served on the host to WebPageTest and recording how long it takes to load. This test web page is 56 KB of HTML, 287 KB of JavaScript, 51 KB of CSS, and 1,128 KB of images (these are typical according to the HTTP Archive). WebPageTest (a 3rd-party, vendor-neutral organization) uses servers located in Virgina and California to measure the page load waterfall in the latest version of Chrome, on a very fast internet connection. The test is ran 5 times each, and the middle (median) result is what is counted from each location. Then the east coast and west coast times are averaged, which should eliminate any bias due to server location. We're interested in first page load, not the repeat/cached view.

If you're really interested, I use the 'Load Time' measurement that's returned from WebPageTest for ranking page speed. I still collect other metrics such as TTFB (time to first byte), fully loaded time, and the speed index, in addition to server setting scores which are translated to grades. You can see these detailed values in the "Raw Results."

This test is important if your site resembles a typical website and you're concerned about speed (which you should be!)

Measuring page speed with WebPageTest.org


In September 2014 I updated this test to be more accurate, and you'll notice page speeds were a bit higher before then. The test used to be run only 3 times from one location using a simulated cable internet connection on Internet Explorer 11. The new method provides much more consistent results.

Overall Page Speed Comparison

HostGator (full benchmark) performs impressively in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 2.88 seconds. Its best run was 2.38 s, but has been as bad as 15.02 s. HostGator's most recent result on Jul 21 was 2.67 seconds. Back in the day HostGator used to share a datacenter with SoftLayer - and they were lightning fast. Now that they made everyone transition to their own datacenter (after the EIG buyout), page speed has been worse, although not as bad as some other hosts here.

GoDaddy (full benchmark) performs incredibly in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.05 seconds. Its best run was 0.31 s, but has been as bad as 37.97 s. GoDaddy's most recent result on Jul 21 was 2.64 seconds. GoDaddy consistently has very fast page load speeds. I'm attributing this to the fact that they have a stellar Hosting Optimization team, headed by Dave Koopman. He actually reached out to me after seeing this site to not only give me kudos for doing this, but offer additional testing resources (which at the moment I am not using). Regardless, he's pretty passionate about their hosting performance and their stats prove it.

StableHost (full benchmark) performs incredibly in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.08 seconds. Its best run was 2.39 s, but has been as bad as 12.29 s. StableHost's most recent result on Jul 21 was 3.09 seconds. Stablehost is one of the few hosts that routinely has page load times under 3 seconds - that's awesome. They have all headers optimized for performance (compression, caching, connections), and their stats back it up.

DreamHost (full benchmark) performs impressively in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.10 seconds. Its best run was 2.24 s, but has been as bad as 15.73 s. DreamHost's most recent result on Jul 21 was 2.99 seconds. I expected Dreamhost to have poor performance, but they're not that bad. There are faster hosts out there, but you're not going to be disappointed with them.

Bluehost (full benchmark) performs above average in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.10 seconds. Its best run was 0.30 s, but has been as bad as 9.17 s. Bluehost's most recent result on Jul 21 was 3.48 seconds. Bluehost is usually pretty inconsistent with its page speeds - sometimes quicker than other hosts, sometimes slower. Its slowest times are usually when accessed from the east coast. While they do optimize connections and compress images, they fail to set caching properly for repeat views.

Recent Raw Results from Jul 21

Host Location Load time TTFB Fully loaded Speed index Keep-alive Score Compress Score Caching Score
BluehostDulles, VA4.4s0.8s4.6s2.0sAAF
BluehostSan Jose, CA2.6s0.3s2.6s1.0sAAF
DreamHostDulles, VA3.8s0.5s3.9s1.9sAAF
DreamHostSan Jose, CA2.2s0.2s2.3s1.2sAAF
GoDaddyDulles, VA3.1s0.4s3.2s1.4sAAF
GoDaddySan Jose, CA2.2s0.2s2.3s1.2sAAF
HostGatorDulles, VA2.9s0.4s3.0s1.4sAAF
HostGatorSan Jose, CA2.4s0.3s2.5s1.4sAAF
InMotion HostingDulles, VA4.2s1.2s4.4s3.0sAFF
InMotion HostingSan Jose, CA2.7s0.2s2.7s1.6sAFF
MDDHostingDulles, VA3.3s0.3s3.5s1.5sAAA
MDDHostingSan Jose, CA2.3s0.2s2.4s1.4sAAA
NamecheapDulles, VA3.2s0.5s3.4s1.4sAAF
NamecheapSan Jose, CA2.3s0.3s2.4s1.4sAAF
Site5Dulles, VA3.1s0.4s3.2s1.6sAFA
Site5San Jose, CA2.8s0.4s2.9s1.8sAFA
StableHostDulles, VA3.5s0.4s3.6s1.8sAFF
StableHostSan Jose, CA2.7s0.2s2.7s1.6sAFF
Yahoo Small BusinessDulles, VA3.1s0.3s3.6s1.8sAFC
Yahoo Small BusinessSan Jose, CA3.2s0.3s3.9s1.5sAFC
Stay in touch!

Signup to be notified when I add new hosts, new tests, or discover surprising results:

FTC Disclaimer

Yes, I do use affiliate links on this site to help cover the cost of testing and $1000+ per year in server charges. Results are 100% unbiased and never skewed to favor a higher commission. Thanks for understanding :)

© 2014-2017 Host Benchmarker.com